تأثير الاتصالات الإدارية في تعزيز البراعة الاستراتيجية

-Andreopoulos C, Louis MW (2010). Managing Innovation Paradoxes: Lessons of Obscurity from Leading Product Design Firms. Long Range Planning, 1 (43),

-2-Birkinshaw, c. Gibson, C (2004). Build prowess in the enterprise’s leading product design firms. Long-Term Planning, 43 (1)

-Carmeli, Abraham & Halevi, Yitzhak, Merav, How Integration Can Integrate with Senior Management and Correct Abuse, USA Journal, Leadership Quarterly 20, (2009)

-Dixon J, Davis G & Kouzmin A (2004) An investigation of civil service reform: threats, challenges, and opportunities. In: R Koch & P Conrad (Eds) Verändertes Denken-Bessere ÖffentlicheDienstel? (Alternative thinking - better public services?)

-Daft, R. L. A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Journal of Academic Management, 2010, Putnam, LP,

-Duncan, R.B. 1976. The Fun Organization: Designing Dual Structures for Innovation. In R.H. Keelman, L.R. (ed.). ; Bundy and Dr. Slevin (Eds.): Managing the Organization, Vol. 1: New York: North Holland

-Derina Holtzhausen, (2002),"The effects of a divisionalised and decentralised organisational structure on a formal internal communication function in a South African organisation", Journal of Communication Management, Vol. 6 Iss 4

-Gibson, C.; and Birkenshaw, J. (2004). Antecedents, outcomes and the mediating role of organizational prowess, Journal of the Academy of Management, 47 (2)

-Gupta, AK; Smith, K. and Shaleley, C.E. (2006) “The Interaction of Exploration and Exploitation,” Journal of the Academy of Management, Vol. 49, No. 4,

-Leventhal, D. and March, c. (1993) “Learning myopia,” Journal of Strategic Management, Winter, Vol. 14, Special Issue: Organizations, Decision-Making and Strategy-

-11-Fang C, Lee J, Schilling MA (2010) Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design: subgroup isolation and organizational learning. Member. Sciences. 21 (3)

-12-Gupta, A.K.; Smith, K. and Shaleley, C.E. (2006) “The Interaction of Exploration and Exploitation,” Journal of the Academy of Management, Vol. 49, No. 4,-

-13-Judge William Keogh, Blocker Christ, Pher P., (2008), Organizational Capabilities for Change and Strategic Ingenuity Flying Plan With Reconnection in European, Journal of Marketing Vol. 42, No. 10

-14-Jurksiene, L. and Pundziene, A. (2016), “The relationship between dynamic capabilities and firm competitive advantage: the mediating role of organizational ambidexterity”, European Business Review, Vol. 28 No. 4

-15-Kao, Q.; Jedaglovich, E., and Chang, H.P. (2009). Unpacking organizational prowess: dimensions, contingency, and synergistic effects. The Science of Organization, 20 (4).

-15-Liu, Y., Luo, Y. and Liu, T. (2009), “Governing buyer-supplier relationships through transactional and relational mechanisms: evidence from China”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 27 No. 4,

-March 20 JG, (1991), “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning,” The Science of Organization, Vol. (2) No. (1).

-17-Musigire, S., Ntayi, J & Ahiauzu, A. (2017), “Is strategic ingenuity moderate organizational support--the sales performance relationship for financial services in Uganda?”, African Journal of Business, Vol. 11, No. 3 and

-18-Navarro, J.& Dewhurst, F.(2007),” Linking organizational learning and customer capital through an ambidexterity context: an empirical investigation in SMEs”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol.18, Issue,10

-19-O’Reilly, CA Tuckman, M. (2013), “Organizational Prowess: Past, Present and Future”, SSRN Online Journal, Vol. 27

-O'Reilly C. & Tushman M.L. (2011), “Organizational dexterity at work: How managers explore and exploit”, Volume (53), .

-21-Raisch, S. and Birkinshaw, J. (2008) “Organizational skill: precedents, outcomes, and supervisors,” Journal of Management, Vol. 34, No. 3,

-Reich, S., Birkinshaw, J, Probst, J and Tuchman, ML. (2009) “Organizational Prowess: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustainable Performance”, Organization Science, Vol. 20, No. 4,

-Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top man-agement model for managing innovation streams. ORGANIZATION Science, 16(5)

Theses and theses

-Tumblr, M., F., Regulating ingenuity: Studies on Written, Written, Written, Written, Arabic, 2013, 2013, Erasmus Rutter University, 2010

Scientific conferences and reports

-Adler, P. S., Goldoftas, B., & Levine, D. I (1999). Flexibility vs Efficiency? A case study of model changes in the Toyota Production System. The Science of Organization, 10(1),.

-Benner, M.J., & Tushman, ML (2003). Exploitation, exploration and operations management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Management Academy Review, 28(2),

-Chen Yan (2017), Dynamic Ingenuity: How Innovators Run Exploration and Exploitation, School of Business, Stevens Institute of Technology, Point Castle in the Hudson, Hoboken, NJ, No. 70, USA.

-Harris, T.; and Sherblom, J.C. (2018), Small Group and Team Communication, Waveland Press, Long Grove, IL

-Osland, J., Erett, M, & Royce, L (2017). Global Leadership Case Studies: The Expert Perception of Large-Scale Global Change. Advances in Global Leadership, 10,

-Quinn, R. E. (1988). Master the contradictions and competing demands of high performance. San Francisco: Juicy Bass

-Jansen, J. J. P., van den Bosch, F. A J., & Volberda, H. W. 2005a. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and ingenuity: the impact of environmental and regulatory precedents. Review of Schmalenbach’s Works, 57:-7-Peters P.G. and Savoy D.J. (eds.) (1998) Evaluation: Evaluation of Public Sector Reforms. Montreal: Canadian Center for Management Development and McGill Quinn University Press.

-8-Shoo (2010) “When and how to be cocky? The relationship between environmental pressures, innovation strategy and organizational capabilities” China

-Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J. F., & Souder, D. (2009). A classification to align perceptions of organizational prowess, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46,

-180-Smith, W.; and Lewis, MW (2011), “Towards a paradox: a dynamic equilibrium model of organization”,

-11-Tushman, ML, & O’Reilly, CA (1996). Funny Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change. California Administration Review, 38(4),