A Pragmatic Study of Consolation in the Holy Qur’an
الكلمات المفتاحية:
القرآن الكريم، التداولية، التعزية، الأفعال الكلامية، الأدب اللغويالملخص
The Qur’an is central to the psychological, spiritual, and moral lives of all Muslims. One of the major communicative functions of the Qur’an is to provide consolation (a sense of comfort, reassured confidence, and inner peace) to both individuals and communities who are suffering from fear, grief, hardship, and anxiety about their life.
This study aims to investigate the concept of "consolation" in the Qur’an from a pragmatic point of view; speech acts, politeness strategies, and illocutionary force. The analysis shows how divine communication has the ability to console the Prophet Muhhamed (PBUH) when he suffered distress and disbelieving. The study employs a qualitative descriptive-analytical methodology which includes insights from pragmatic theories. The results of this study demonstrate that Qur’anic consolation is systematically realized with assertive, directive, expressive, and commissive speech acts, reinforced by divine politeness strategies (reassurance, honorifics, mitigation, and empathy).
Finally, the study concludes that while Qur’anic consolation is thematic, it is also basically encoded in the linguistic and pragmatic structure of the Qur’an, making it a powerful and enduring source of human psychology and spirituality.
المراجع
Ali, A. Y. (2004). The Holy Qur’an: Text, translation and commentary (Rev. ed.). Amana Publications.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Duclow, D. F. (1979). Perspective and therapy in Boethius’s Consolation of Philosophy. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 4(4), 334–343. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/4.4.334
Jēdan, C. (2020). A new model of consolation. Religions, 11(11), Article 601. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11110601
Klass, D. (1993). Consolation and immortality: Bereaved parents’ continuing bond with their children. Death Studies, 17(4), 343–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481189308252614
Klass, D., Silverman, P. R., & Nickman, S. L. (Eds.). (1996). Continuing bonds: New understandings of grief. Routledge.
Klass, D. (2006). Grief, religion, and spirituality. In K. Garces-Foley (Ed.), Death and religion in a changing world (pp. 283–304). M. E. Sharpe.
Klass, D. (2013). Religion and spirituality in loss, grief, and mourning. In D. K. Meagher & D. E. Balk (Eds.), Handbook of thanatology (2nd ed., pp. 127–134). Routledge.
Klass, D. (2014). Grief, consolation, and religions: A conceptual framework. OMEGA—Journal of Death and Dying, 69(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2190/OM.69.1.a
Norberg, A., Bergsten, M., & Lundman, B. (2001). A model of consolation. Nursing Ethics, 8(6), 544–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/096973300100800606
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
Weyhofen, H. T. (1983). Trost: Modelle des religiösen und philosophischen Trostes und ihre Beurteilung durch die Religionskritik. Peter Lang.
التنزيلات
منشور
كيفية الاقتباس
إصدار
القسم
الفئات
الرخصة
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2026 مجلة الباحث

هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
يُسمح للقراء بمشاركة وتوزيع وتعديل هذا العمل، بشرط الإشارة إلى المؤلف(ين) الأصلي(ين) والمصدر بشكل مناسب. يجب توضيح أي تعديلات تُجرى على المحتوى. قد تخضع الاستخدامات التجارية وأذونات إضافية لسياسات المجلة.





